Tecno Spark 8C vs Infinix Note 12
VS
Tecno Spark 8C Infinix Note 12
Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.6-inch Tecno Spark 8C (with Unisoc T606) that was released on January 31 2022 against the Infinix Note 12 which is powered by MediaTek Helio G88 and came out 3 months after. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments
Key differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Tecno Spark 8C
- Water-resistant body (IPX2 classification)
- Higher display refresh rate – 90 Hz
Reasons to consider the Infinix Note 12
- 47% higher pixel density (393 vs 267 PPI)
- 46% better performance in AnTuTu Benchmark (246K versus 169K)
- Modern USB Type-C port
- Compatible with Wi-Fi 5 wireless networks
- Supports 33W fast charging
- Uses a faster type of memory: LPDDR4X 2133 MHz
- Stereo speakers
- Slow-motion recording at 120FPS
- AMOLED display (versus competitor's IPS LCD)
- The front-facing camera can record video at 1080p
Review
Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Spark 8C 65 Note 12 74 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Spark 8C 21 Note 12 32 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Spark 8C 70 Note 12 78 Camera Photo and video recording quality Spark 8C 47 Note 12 56 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Spark 8C 56 Note 12 71 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Spark 8C 51 Note 12 60
Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Tecno Spark 8C Price Infinix Note 12 Calculate
Tests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Spark 8C vs Note 12
Display
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| PPI | 267 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Max rated brightness | 450 nits | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | No | - |
| Screen protection | Tempered glass | Tempered glass |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.7% | 86% |
| Display features | - | - DCI-P3 |
Design and build
| Height | 164.57 mm (6.48 inches) | 164.4 mm (6.47 inches) |
| Width | 76 mm (2.99 inches) | 76.7 mm (3.02 inches) |
| Thickness | 8.95 mm (0.35 inches) | 7.9 mm (0.31 inches) |
| Weight | 193 gramm (6.81 oz) | 184.5 gramm (6.51 oz) |
| Waterproof | IPX2 | No |
| Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | Black Gray Green Purple | Black Gold Blue |
| Fingerprint scanner | Yes rear | Yes in home button |
Screen-to-body ratio Spark 8C 83.7% Note 12 +3% 86%
Performance
Tests of Tecno Spark 8C and Infinix Note 12 in the benchmarks
SoC | Chipset | Unisoc T606 | MediaTek Helio G88 |
| Max. clock | 1600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 1.6 GHz: Cortex-A75 | - 6 cores at 1.8 GHz: Cortex-A55 - 2 cores at 2 GHz: Cortex-A75 |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | - |
| Lithography process | 12 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| GPU clock | 650 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | - | ~62 GFLOPS |
Memory | RAM size | 2 3 4 GB | 4 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory clock | - | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 1 | 2 |
Storage | Storage size | 64 GB | 64 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
| Memory card max. size | Up to 256 GB | Up to 2048 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Spark 8C 301 Note 12 +25% 375 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Spark 8C 1181 Note 12 +12% 1320 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Spark 8C 169467 Note 12 +46% 246581
| CPU | 60630 | - |
| GPU | 21826 | - |
| Memory | 38655 | - |
| UX | 48282 | - |
| Total score | 169467 | 246581 |
3DMark Wild Life Performance Spark 8C 397 Note 12 +80% 716
| PCMark 3.0 score | 7368 | 7791 |
Sources: 3DMark [3] [4] ▶️ Submit your AnTuTu result
Software
| Operating system | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| ROM | HiOS 7.6 | XOS 10.6 |
Battery
Specifications | Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Charge power | - | 33 W |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Replaceable | No | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse charging | No | No |
| Fast charging | No | Yes (50% in 28 min) |
| Full charging time | - | 1:19 hr |
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphones
Main camera | Matrix | 13 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 4128 x 3096 | 8160 x 6120 |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K video recording | No | No |
| 4K video recording | No | No |
| 1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
| Slow motion | No | 120 FPS (720p) |
| Lenses | 2 (13 MP + 0 MP) | 2 (50 MP + 2 MP) |
| Wide (main) lens | - 13 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 27 mm | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.6 - Pixel size: 0.64 micron - Sensor: 1/2.76" Samsung S5KJN1 (ISOCELL Plus CMOS) - Phase autofocus |
| Depth lens | Yes | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
| Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
Selfie camera | Megapixels | 8 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Image resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Aperture | - | f/2.0 |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | - | LE A2DP |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
| GPS | GPS Beidou | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Depends on the region |
| Infrared port | No | No |
Network | Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
| Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
| Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
| eSIM support* | No | No |
| Hybrid slot | - | No |
| LTE Cat* | 4 | 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Category | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January 2022 | April 2022 |
| Release date | February 2022 | April 2022 |
| Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Fingerprint | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint |
*Disclaimer! NFC GSM network support and some other specs can be different depending on the country.
Conclusion
After analyzing all the data we think that the Infinix Note 12 is definitely a better buy.
Cast your vote
So which phone would you choose? Tecno Spark 8C 0 (0%) Infinix Note 12 0 (0%) Vote Total votes:
<, 1 Related comparisons
1. Tecno Spark 8C or Xiaomi Redmi 9A 2. Tecno Spark 8C or Infinix Hot 12 Play 3. Tecno Spark 8C or Oppo Realme C30 4. Infinix Note 12 or Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 5. Infinix Note 12 or Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 6. Infinix Note 12 or Infinix Note 10 Pro 7. Infinix Note 12 or Infinix Note 12 Pro 8. Infinix Note 12 or Tecno Camon 19
User opinions
You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Send
source nanoreview.net
Novedades para 2021 Cu les son las principales predicciones 
Redmi Note 10 Pro Max Stock Wallpaper 1080x2400 - 006
Asus Zenfone 6 Stock Wallpaper 17 - 1080x2340 
Dubai Marina Wallpaper 02 - 2880x2560 
Forest Phone Wallpaper - 005
Punch Hole Wallpaper - 054
Landscape Phone Wallpaper 135 - 1080x2340 
Sunrise Phone Wallpaper 1080x2340 - 005
