Vivo Y35 vs Samsung Galaxy A23
VS Vivo Y35 Samsung Galaxy A23Here we compared two smartphones: the 6.58-inch Vivo Y35 (with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680) that was released on September 15 2022 against the Samsung Galaxy A23 which is powered by the same chip and came out 7 months before. On this page you will find tests full specs strengths and weaknesses of each of the gadgets.
- Differences
- Review
- Specs
- Benchmarks
- Battery life
- Camera
- Comments
Key differences
An overview of the main advantages of each smartphone Reasons to consider the Vivo Y35- The phone is 7-months newer
- Reverse charging feature
- Optical image stabilization
- Has an ultra-wide angle camera lens
- Supports Dolby Atmos sound technology
Review
Display Screen quality color accuracy brightness Vivo Y35 76 Galaxy A23 72 Performance CPU/GPU performance in apps and games Vivo Y35 39 Galaxy A23 32 Battery Battery life charging type and speed Vivo Y35 84 Galaxy A23 85 Camera Photo and video recording quality Vivo Y35 62 Galaxy A23 63 Connectivity Networks ports data transmission Vivo Y35 74 Galaxy A23 77 NanoReview score Final comparison evaluation Vivo Y35 65 Galaxy A23 63Value for money
You can enter your local price of these phones (in USD or any other currency) and click on the "Calculate" button to see which one has a better value for money. Vivo Y35 Price Samsung Galaxy A23 CalculateTests and specifications
Comparison table of technical specifications and tests Phone: Vivo Y35 vs Galaxy A23Display
Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT |
Size | 6.58 inches | 6.6 inches |
Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels | 1080 x 2408 pixels |
Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
PPI | 401 ppi | 400 ppi |
Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
Max rated brightness | 500 nits | 460 nits |
HDR support | No | No |
Screen protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
Screen-to-body ratio | 83.4% | 83% |
Design and build
Height | 164.3 mm (6.47 inches) | 164.5 mm (6.48 inches) |
Width | 76.1 mm (3 inches) | 76.9 mm (3.03 inches) |
Thickness | 8.28 mm (0.33 inches) | 8.4 mm (0.33 inches) |
Weight | 188 gramm (6.63 oz) | 195 gramm (6.88 oz) |
Waterproof | - | No |
Rear material | Plastic | Plastic |
Frame material | Plastic | Plastic |
Colors | Black Gold | White Black Blue Yellow |
Fingerprint scanner | Yes in home button | Yes in home button |
Performance
Tests of Vivo Y35 and Samsung Galaxy A23 in the benchmarksChipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
Max. clock | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
CPU cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
Architecture | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) | - 4 cores at 1.9 GHz: Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53) - 4 cores at 2.4 GHz: Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) |
Lithography process | 6 nanometers | 6 nanometers |
Graphics | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
GPU clock | 1114 MHz | 1114 MHz |
RAM size | 4 8 GB | 4 6 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory clock | 2133 MHz | - |
Channels | 2 | 2 |
Storage size | 64 128 256 GB | 32 64 128 GB |
Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
Memory card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Memory card max. size | Up to 1024 GB | Up to 1024 GB |
Benchmarks
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core) Vivo Y35 377 Galaxy A23 +3% 387 Geekbench 5 (Multi-Core) Vivo Y35 1524 Galaxy A23 +8% 1646 AnTuTu Benchmark 9 Vivo Y35 262681 Galaxy A23 +3% 269617CPU | - | 81885 |
GPU | - | 48510 |
Memory | - | 64789 |
UX | - | 71783 |
Total score | 262681 | 269617 |
Stability | - | 98% |
Graphics test | - | 2 FPS |
Graphics score | - | 439 |
PCMark 3.0 score | - | 7180 |
Software
Operating system | Android 12 | Android 12 |
ROM | Funtouch 12 | One UI 4.1 |
OS size | - | 24 GB |
Battery
Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
Charge power | 44 W | 25 W |
Battery type | Li-Po | - |
Replaceable | No | No |
Wireless charging | No | No |
Reverse charging | Yes | No |
Fast charging | Yes (70% in 34 min) | Yes (32% in 30 min) |
Full charging time | 0:55 hr | 1:43 hr |
Web browsing | - | 13:42 hr |
Watching video | - | 12:41 hr |
Gaming | - | 06:33 hr |
Standby | - | 127 hr |
Camera
Specs and camera test of smartphonesMatrix | 50 megapixels | 50 megapixels |
Image resolution | 8192 x 6144 | 8700 x 5800 |
Zoom | Digital | Digital |
Flash | LED | LED |
Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
8K video recording | No | No |
4K video recording | No | No |
1080p video recording | Up to 30FPS | Up to 30FPS |
Slow motion | - | 120 FPS (720p) |
Lenses | 3 (50 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) | 4 (50 MP + 5 MP + 2 MP + 2 MP) |
Wide (main) lens | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Phase autofocus | - 50 MP - Aperture: f/1.8 - Focal length: 26 mm - Phase autofocus - Optical stabilization |
Ultra-wide lens | - | - 5 MP - Aperture: f/2.2 - Pixel size: 1.12 micron - Sensor: 1/5" (CMOS) |
Macro lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
Depth lens | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 | - 2 MP - Aperture: f/2.4 |
Camera features | - Bokeh mode | - Bokeh mode - Pro mode |
Megapixels | 16 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
Image resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3264 x 2448 |
Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 FPS |
Connectivity
Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB PAN OPP MAP HSP HID HFP DIP AVRCP A2DP |
USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
USB version | 2 | 2 |
USB features | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG | - Charging - USB-Storage mode - OTG |
GPS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS | GPS GLONASS Beidou Galileo QZSS |
NFC* | Depends on the region | Yes |
Infrared port | No | No |
Number of SIM* | 2 | 2 |
Type of SIM card | Nano | Nano |
Multi SIM mode | Standby | Standby |
eSIM support* | No | No |
Hybrid slot | No | No |
LTE Cat* | 13 | - |
5G support | No | No |
Sound
Speakers | Mono | Mono |
Headphone audio jack | Yes | Yes |
FM radio | Yes | - |
Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
Category | Mid-range | Budget |
Announced | September 2022 | March 2022 |
Release date | September 2022 | March 2022 |
Sensors | - Proximity sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient light sensor - Compass - Fingerprint | - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint |
Conclusion
If the display performance and design are more important to you then choose the Vivo Y35. But if the software and sound are more of a priority – go for the Samsung Galaxy A23.
Cast your vote
So which phone would you choose? Vivo Y35 17 (85%) Samsung Galaxy A23 3 (15%) Vote Total votes: 20Related comparisons
1. Vivo Y35 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 2. Vivo Y35 and Vivo Y33s 3. Vivo Y35 and Oppo A96 4. Samsung Galaxy A23 and Galaxy A13 5. Samsung Galaxy A23 and A32 5G 6. Samsung Galaxy A23 and Galaxy A52 7. Samsung Galaxy A23 and A52s 5G 8. Samsung Galaxy A23 and A33 5GUser opinions
You can share your opinion or ask a question in the comments below Name Message Send Sendsource nanoreview.net
Vivo gives discounts on its smartphone again - Zing Gadget
Alleged specifications for Vivo s upcoming flagship phone surface
Vivo XPlay 6 Matte Black Edition In Pictures - Classy Black Beauty
Vivo Smartphone with Detachable Flying Camera Revealed in a New Patent
Leak vivo Y70 Reportedly Will Offer 4 500mAh Battery and 8GB RAM IP Tech
vivo V15 Pro Becomes The Fastest Selling Smartphone In vivo History
Vivo V9 Wallpapers - Wallpaper Cave
Vivo Smartphone with Detachable Flying Camera Revealed in a New Patent
Android 12 Beta Android Developers
Whatsapp Chat Wallpaper - 222
Roxette suspende su gira por la grave salud de su cantante - LA GACETA
Escalofriantes decapitaciones de presos en c rcel de Brasil - Tucum n a
1170x2532 Wallpaper - 070
Android 12 Inspired Wallpaper - 13
Assertivo - Dicio Dicion rio Online de Portugu s
Beautiful Bedroom Wallpapers 37 - 1920 x 1080